<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hill-vt.com/blog/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The IT Organization: Strategic or Tactical</title><link>http://hill-vt.com/blog/archive/2008/03/14/The-IT-Organization_3A00_-Strategic-or-Tactical.aspx</link><description>In today&amp;#39;s tHAWT , we are going to talk about an article that appeared in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). It struck me as particularly relevant given my recent comments about the importance of IT and the comments of Nicholas Carr. The article almost</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>re: The IT Organization: Strategic or Tactical</title><link>http://hill-vt.com/blog/archive/2008/03/14/The-IT-Organization_3A00_-Strategic-or-Tactical.aspx#1645</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:25:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">db0a646c-cc80-47b5-b9e3-b07687ea655e:1645</guid><dc:creator>msteinberg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Whether you agree with Nicholas Carr, or not (or even Michel), there are five assertions made my Mr. Carr that should matter in today's IT environment given the economics and business of the organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can read those five things here: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/03/5_assertions_by.html?cid=nl_IWK_daily"&gt;http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/03/5_assertions_by.html?cid=nl_IWK_daily&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>